Does anyone know of any non-invasive, scientifically proven alternative to Coronary Bypass Surgery? - are invasive coronary angiograms reliable
My father was a diabetic for the last 25 or more and is 65, suffered a recent heart attack. Angiography reveled in a block 100% of the main arteries and 4 blocks in other blood vessels to block 99-85% respectively. It is recommended that a bypass operation. He has no other symptoms of shortness of breath, pain, etc.. Because he is diabetic, I am on the process of healing and recovery after the operation concerned .. Any information is appreciated.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Are Invasive Coronary Angiograms Reliable Does Anyone Know Of Any Non-invasive, Scientifically Proven Alternative To Coronary Bypass Surgery?
3 comments:
Depending on where the vessels are the locks for them. His father had blockages in multiple vessels, which limits the options. Angioplasty and stenting is an alternative, but not very good if it blocks in several ships. CABG (CAP) were compared with angioplasty with stent implantation in patients with multivessel disease and diabetes. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with significantly better patient outcomes associated with diabetes and is currently recommended by angioplasty in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. In studies, CABG is associated with a decreased need for revascularization, ie, we need a new procedure to fix the locks connected. The incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke and death was also reduced in diabetic patientsHad patients with coronary artery bypass surgery over angioplasty with stent.
There are risks and benefits of each procedure. The results following coronary bypass surgery are very good now. Uncontrolled diabetes impair wound healing and is associated with a worse prognosis associated with surgery are. Therefore, it is important that you work with your doctor to make sure that your diabetes is under good control, no matter what you do decide. You should talk to your doctor to examine the various options and their risks and benefits. I recommend that you do not coronary artery bypass graft, because the results are better on the basis of the studies.
Need for coronary bypass surgery ... not as bad as you think ... He feels much better and much less risky to the health of the heart are wise after the surgery ... probably 6-8 weeks pretty well healed and back to normal, or best way to bypass surgery ...
He has to be operated on.
It is a less invasive technique - angioplasty, but not all are suitable and angiography have shown that physicians, when his father was right.
Post a Comment